In re the Estate of Weill

35 Misc. 2d 64, 229 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3041
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided June 25, 1962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

John D. Bennett, S.

Motion by petitioner to strike the reply of the respondent to a notice to admit pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act on the ground that the reply has not been properly verified is denied.

The reply to the notice to admit has been verified by the attorney for the respondent, who is a resident of Vienna, Austria. Section 322 provides that the reply to a notice to admit be made by a “ sworn statement ” of the party to whom the request is directed.

A verified response to a notice to admit satisfies the requirement that the statement be sworn to by the party (Matter of Merritt, 187 Misc. 869) and a reply to a demand to admit, being [65]*65analogous to a pleading, may in a proper ease be verified by the attorney for the party upon whom it is binding (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 99, subd. 3; Seidenberg v. Rosen, 114 N. Y. S. 2d 279).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Weill, 35 Misc. 2d 64, 229 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3041 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1962).

35 Misc. 2d 64 (In re the Estate of Weill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ELRAC, Inc. v. McDonald
186 Misc. 2d 830 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
Janczyk v. Davis
337 N.W.2d 272 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)