In re the Estate of Ward

186 A.D. 261, 174 N.Y.S. 182, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 186 A.D. 261 (In re the Estate of Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Ward, 186 A.D. 261, 174 N.Y.S. 182, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

By subdivision 7 of the will the trustee is directed to invest the sum of $6,000 in trust and to pay over the income thereof to the petitioner for her support and maintenance during lifetime. It is further provided that in the event that the income prove insufficient for such proper care then the trustee may use so much of the trust principal as may be necessary for such purpose, also that upon her death the trustee is directed to pay her funeral expenses and erect a suitable headstone to mark her grave, and that any balance that may remain shall fall into the residuary estate for the benefit of the remaindermen.

We are impressed with the soundness of the contention that the petitioner is entitled to be given such a sum yearly as is necessary for her support and maintenance, in circumstances fitting and reasonable in her station in life, and that the only discretion vested in the trustee is to preserve the trust fund from extravagance and waste by the petitioner.

The remaindermen are not made parties to these proceedings, and, therefore, we are not called upon at this time to construe the will and direct a judgment in the case. The proceedings are remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for such action as to the petitioner as may seem proper. We are of the opinion that [263]*263the surrogate has ample power to construe the will and effectuate, by a proper decree, the intention of the testator.-

All concurred.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant payable out of the estate, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Accounting of Bloch
196 Misc. 227 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
In Re the Accounting of the Manufacturers National Bank of Troy
199 N.E. 491 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
In re the Estate of Gatehouse
149 Misc. 648 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Account of Proceedings of Walsh
125 Misc. 901 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1925)
In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of Johnson
123 Misc. 834 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1924)
Rezzemini v. . Brooks
140 N.E. 237 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D. 261, 174 N.Y.S. 182, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-ward-nyappdiv-1919.