In re the Estate of Walker
This text of 117 Misc. 805 (In re the Estate of Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition is entertained. This court has jurisdiction to fix the bond of resident testamentary trustees appointed by a will admitted to probate in England and recorded in this office as provided in section 44, Decedent Estate-Law (as amended by chapter 293, Laws of 1921), where the trust consists of realty within this county. The authorities holding that the -Surrogate’s Court has not jurisdiction of trusts created by the will of a non-resident have all recognized the jurisdiction of this court where there was real property in the corpus of the trust located in this state. People ex rel. Safford v. Surro[806]*806gate’s Court, 229 N. Y. 495; Matter of Hoyt, 103 Misc. Rep. 614; Matter of Yuill, 109 id. 465; Surrogate’s Court Act, § 171. As the petition alleges there is some uncertainty whether Frank W. Arnold, named as a co-trustee, will qualify, a citation should issue to him, or his renunciation filed. Bond fixed in the penal sum of $120,000.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 Misc. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-walker-nysurct-1921.