In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas

DecidedMay 30, 2024

Docket14-24-00353-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas (In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00353-CV

IN RE THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA HUTCHINGS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-12

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, May 20, 2024, relator Randall Patterson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Eric Berg, presiding judge of the County Court at Law of Washington County, to vacate his December 14, 2023 order and his May 7, 2024 order directing relator to deposit estate funds into the registry of the trial court.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(a) (“The petition must, under appropriate headings and in the order here indicated, contain the following. . . a complete list of all parties.”); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2) (“Relator must file with the petition. . . a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.”) We deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00353-CV

IN RE THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA HUTCHINGS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-12

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, May 20, 2024, relator Randall Patterson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Eric Berg, presiding judge of the County Court at Law of Washington County, to vacate his December 14, 2023 order and his May 7, 2024 order directing relator to deposit estate funds into the registry of the trial court.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(a) (“The petition must, under appropriate headings and in the order here indicated, contain the following. . . a complete list of all parties.”); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2) (“Relator must file with the petition. . . a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.”) We deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re the Estate of Virginia Hutchings v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-virginia-hutchings-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.