In re the Estate of Unpingco

2 N. Mar. I. Commw. 89
CourtNorthern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court
DecidedMarch 12, 1985
DocketCIVIL ACTION NO. 84-415
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N. Mar. I. Commw. 89 (In re the Estate of Unpingco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Unpingco, 2 N. Mar. I. Commw. 89 (cnmitrialct 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: APPLICATION OF U.S. ESTATE TAX PROVISIONS IN THE COMMONWEALTH

The Administratrix in this estate has filed a petition for final distribution but the court required points and authorities to be filed relative to the.question as to whether the estate is subject to the U.S. estate tax provisions (26 USC §§ 2001 et seq). For the purposes of assisting and guiding personal representatives in similar estates, this memorandum addresses general rules as to when the provisions of the estate tax laws will be applied.

The basic formative document for the Government of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands is the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America (Covenant). Article VI of that document concerns the applicability or [92]*92non-applicability of the United States tax laws in the Commonwealth. Section 601 is pertinent to the resolution of

the issue at bar and reads:

(a) The income tax laws in force in the United States will come into force in the Northern Mariana Islands as a local territorial income tax on the first day of January following the effective date of this Section, in the same manner as those laws are in force in Guam.
(b) Any individual who is a.citizen or a resident of the United States, of Guam or of the Northern Mariana Islands (including
a national of the United States who is not a citizen), will file only one income tax return with respect to his income, in a manner similar to the provisions of Section 935 of Title 26, United States Code.
(c) References in the Internal Revenue Code to Guam will be deemed also to refer to the Northern Mariana Islands, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent .thereof or of this Covenant.

As can readily be seen there is no specific reference in § 601 to the federal estate and gift tax laws. The term "income tax laws" found in § 601(a) does not encompass estate and gift taxes as the latter are not income taxes but are excise taxes. United States v Manufacturer National Bank (1960) 363 U.S. 194, 80 S.Ct. 1103, 5 L.Ed. 2d 1158; United States v Woodward, (1921) 256 U.S. 632, 41 S.Ct. 615, 65 L.Ed. 1131.

The estate tax is not a tax on the legatees and devisees who succeed on death, but the tax is on the interest caused [93]*93by reason of death and what is imposed, is an excise tax upon the transfer of the estate on the death of the owner. Commissioner v Clise (1941, CA 9) 122 F.2d 998, cert den. 315 U.S. 821, 62 S.Ct. 914, 86 L.Ed. 1218; Landman v Commissioner (1941, CA 10) 123 F.2d 787, cert den. 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct. 799, 86 L.Ed. 1209.

The more general application of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is found in Section 601(c) and any reference in the Code to Guam will be deemed also to refer to the Commonwealth

Section 2001(a) of the IRC states that the estate tax is imposed on the transfer of the taxable estate of every decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States. "United States" is defined in Section 7701(a)(9) of Title 26 of the U.S. Code as to includ.e only the fifty States and the District of Columbia.

However, Guam, as.a possession of the United States, is encompassed within the provisions of Sections 2208 and 2209 of Title 26 which provide:

§ 2208. Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States.
A decedent who was a citizen of the United States and a resident of a possession thereof at the time of his death shall, for purposes of the tax imposed by this chapter, be considered a "citizen" of the United States within the meaning of that term wherever used [94]*94in this title unless he acquired his United States citizenship solely by reason of (1) his being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or (2) his birth or residence within such possession of the United States.
§ 2209. Certain residents of possessions considered nonresidents not citizens of the United States.
A decedent who was a citizen of the United States and a resident of a.possession thereof at the time of his death shall, for purposes of the tax imposed by this chapter, be ' considered a "nonresident not a citizen of the United States" within the meaning of that term wherever used in this-'title, but only if such person acquired his United States citizenship solely by reas.on of (1) his being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or (2) his birth or residence within such possession of the United States.

The import of these two sections are:

1. A U.S. citizen cannot move out of the United States and establish his/her citizenship in a U.S. possession and avoid estate taxes on death.

Rev. Rule 74-25, CB 1979-1 p. 284.

2. A person who acquired his/her citizenship solely by reason of his/her being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or his/her birth within such possession is not a citizen for-purposes of estate tax application.

Although Sections 2208 and 2209 do not specifically refer to Guam and the term "possession" is used, it is concluded that § 601(c) of the Covenant must be read liberally and to include the applicability of these two sections to [95]*95the Commonwealth. It appears that the intent of §§ 601(a) and 601(c) is to align the Commonwealth with Guam in so far as the application of the Internal Revenue Code is concerned except where it is specified that the Commonwealth is to be treated differently (e.g., Section 602 relating to the rebate of income taxes). Similar references to relating the Commonwealth to Guam are seen iri Article IV, § 403(b),

Article VI, §§ 603(c), 604(a), 605, and 606(b) of the Covenant.

Therefore, although U.S. citizens residing in the Commonwealth are subject to federal estate tax laws whether their assets are in the Commonwealth or the United States (26 USC § 2031(a)), other persons who are residents of the Commonwealth and become United States citizen solely by reason of being a citizen of the Commonwealth or because of birth or residence in the Commonwealth are considered as nonresidents not citizens of the United States for estate tax purposes.

Article III of the Covenant establishes the citizenship and nationality of the inhabitants of the Commonwealth.

Sections 301 .and 303 state:

Section 301. The following persons and their children under the age of 18 years on the effective date of this Section, who are not citizens or nationals of the United States under any other provision of law, and who on [96]*96that date do not owe allegiance to any foreign state, are declared to be citizens of the United States, except as otherwise provided in Section 302:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Woodward
256 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1921)
United States v. Jacobs
306 U.S. 363 (Supreme Court, 1939)
Bodell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
138 F.2d 553 (First Circuit, 1943)
Landman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
123 F.2d 787 (Tenth Circuit, 1941)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clise
122 F.2d 998 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N. Mar. I. Commw. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-unpingco-cnmitrialct-1985.