In re the Estate of Underhill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Underhill

193 A.D. 957

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1920·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An appeal from an order denying a motion for reargument cannot" be entertained by this court. The court which hears the original motion can alone judge whether it has failed to consider any of the points raised upon a motion, and its determination upon such a point must be final. (Matter of Grout, 83 Hun, 25; Harding v. Conlon, 146 App. Div. .842; Peterson v. Felt, 61 id. 176; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 id. 191.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An appeal from an order denying a motion for reargument cannot" be entertained by this court. The court which hears the original motion can alone judge whether it has failed to consider any of the points raised upon a motion, and its determination upon such a point must be final. (Matter of Grout, 83 Hun, 25; Harding v. Conlon, 146 App. Div. .842; Peterson v. Felt, 61 id. 176; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 id. 191.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Underhill, 193 A.D. 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

193 A.D. 957 (In re the Estate of Underhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related