In re the Estate of Underhill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Underhill

193 A.D. 957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D. 957 (In re the Estate of Underhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Underhill, 193 A.D. 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An appeal from an order denying a motion for reargument cannot" be entertained by this court. The court which hears the original motion can alone judge whether it has failed to consider any of the points raised upon a motion, and its determination upon such a point must be final. (Matter of Grout, 83 Hun, 25; Harding v. Conlon, 146 App. Div. .842; Peterson v. Felt, 61 id. 176; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 id. 191.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An appeal from an order denying a motion for reargument cannot" be entertained by this court. The court which hears the original motion can alone judge whether it has failed to consider any of the points raised upon a motion, and its determination upon such a point must be final. (Matter of Grout, 83 Hun, 25; Harding v. Conlon, 146 App. Div. .842; Peterson v. Felt, 61 id. 176; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 id. 191.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D. 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-underhill-nyappdiv-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack