In re the Estate of Ufland

175 Misc. 996, 24 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2546
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedJuly 12, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 Misc. 996 (In re the Estate of Ufland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Ufland, 175 Misc. 996, 24 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2546 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

Foley, S.

The preliminary motion to dismiss this proceeding to fix attorney’s fees for services rendered to the assignee of the beneficiaries is denied. The services were rendered in defending the assignment made to the client. The assignee, as a person interested in the estate, stood in the place of the assignors and was entitled to assert all of their rights. The provisions of section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, which deal with the jurisdiction of the court to fix the compensation of attorneys for persons interested in the estate, amply cover such a situation and confer full power upon the surrogate to make an appropriate determination. (Matter of Maggio, 169 Misc. 1039; Matter of Abruzzo, 139 id. 559; Matter of Parsons, 121 id. 747; affd. on opinion below, 208 App. Div. 769; Matter of Matheson, 265 N. Y. 81.)

It is immaterial whether the services were rendered in the Surrogate's Court, in the Supreme Court or in any other court so long as they are devoted to the enforcement of the rights of a person interested in the estate, in that capacity.

The rule as to services rendered in other courts has likewise been applied in the fixation of the fees of an attorney who has recovered assets for the estate or who has rendered services for the executor, administrator or trustee of the estate. (Matter of Levine, 247 App. Div. 19; Matter of Abruzzo, supra.) The lien of the attorney in every such case is entitled to protection and enforcement in the Surrogate’s Court.

Submit intermediate order on notice denying the motion to dismiss accordingly. The proceeding is set for trial on the 29th day of July, 1940, at three-thirty p. m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Haas
33 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
In re the Accounting of Miller
187 Misc. 70 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 Misc. 996, 24 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-ufland-nysurct-1940.