In re the Estate of Tuminelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Tuminelli

160 A.D.2d 713, 555 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D.2d 713 (In re the Estate of Tuminelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Tuminelli, 160 A.D.2d 713, 555 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

an action pursuant to SCPA 2103 to discover the proceeds of property formerly owned by the decedent, Ignazio LaManna appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, A.S.), dated July 29, 1988, which denied his motion to vacate so much of a judgment of the same court (Bloom, S.), dated October 26, 1982, as directed him to turn over $16,000 to the Public Administrator of Kings County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

The Surrogate did not err denying LaManna’s motion to vacate the judgment dated October 26, 1982, as LaManna failed to establish any grounds which would warrant vacatur. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action pursuant to SCPA 2103 to discover the proceeds of property formerly owned by the decedent, Ignazio LaManna appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, A.S.), dated July 29, 1988, which denied his motion to vacate so much of a judgment of the same court (Bloom, S.), dated October 26, 1982, as directed him to turn over $16,000 to the Public Administrator of Kings County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

The Surrogate did not err denying LaManna’s motion to vacate the judgment dated October 26, 1982, as LaManna failed to establish any grounds which would warrant vacatur. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D.2d 713, 555 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-tuminelli-nyappdiv-1990.