In re the Estate of Toplitz

109 Misc. 401
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided November 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fowler, S.

The sole beneficiary of the trust estate having died and the power of sale vested in the trustees never having been exercised during his lifetime, has become extinguished, as there is no longer any necessity for the conversion of the real estate to accomplish any particular purpose specified in the will. Gourley v. Campbell, 66 N. Y. 169; Chamberlain v. Taylor, 105 id. 185. The fact that there may be debts existing against this estate is not in itself sufficient to sustain and keep alive the power of sale, for such power cannot be exercised for the payment of debts and obligations. Matter of McComb, 117 N. Y. 378. I will therefore hold that there is no valid, subsisting power of sale contained in this will.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Toplitz, 109 Misc. 401 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1919).

109 Misc. 401 (In re the Estate of Toplitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Toplitz
191 A.D. 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)