In re the Estate of Thompson

271 A.D.2d 570

Opinions

Hill, P. J.

The decree determining that appellant is not the child of John and Joanna Peterson and thus not the sister of decedent Anna Thompson, is sustained only by the testimony, of an interested witness, Van Hoff, and an elderly woman whose memory is faulty and whose testimony is contradictory and not impressive. The family have always treated the appellant as one of the children, have written to her and addressed her as such. The father and mother so stated to a census enumerator. The theory of legitimacy should not be disturbed at so late a date and on evidence so vague. (Matter of Findlay, 253 N. Y. 1; Matter of Matthews, 153 N. Y. 443; Hynes v. McDermott, 91 N. Y. 451; Matter of Perrin, 258 App. Div. 384.)

The decree should be reversed and the prayer of the petition denied, and the appellant’s interest in the estate decreed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Thompson, 271 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

271 A.D.2d 570 (In re the Estate of Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hynes v. . McDermott
91 N.Y. 451 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
In Re the Estate of Findlay
170 N.E. 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Boyd v. Boyd
169 N.E. 632 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
In Re the Estate of Matthews
47 N.E. 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Danker v. Prudential Insurance of America
231 A.D. 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
In re Amending the Petition & Letters of Administration in the Estate of Perrin
258 A.D. 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)