In re the Estate of Tastassa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Tastassa

50 A.D.2d 572, 375 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12339

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 572 (In re the Estate of Tastassa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Tastassa, 50 A.D.2d 572, 375 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a probate proceeding, the objectant appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated January 27, 1975, which, inter alia, admitted the will to probate. The notice of appeal is hereby amended to render the appeal also from an order of the same court, dated January 2, 1975, which dismissed appellant’s objections to probate. Order and decree affirmed, without costs. We are in accord with the Surrogate’s determination that appellant’s objections should be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Further, for that reason and under the circumstances appearing in the record on this appeal, appellant was not entitled to an accounting. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a probate proceeding, the objectant appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated January 27, 1975, which, inter alia, admitted the will to probate. The notice of appeal is hereby amended to render the appeal also from an order of the same court, dated January 2, 1975, which dismissed appellant’s objections to probate. Order and decree affirmed, without costs. We are in accord with the Surrogate’s determination that appellant’s objections should be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Further, for that reason and under the circumstances appearing in the record on this appeal, appellant was not entitled to an accounting. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 572, 375 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-tastassa-nyappdiv-1975.