In re the Estate of Tarka

41 A.D.3d 345, 837 N.Y.S.2d 571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Decree, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee R. Roth, S.), entered April 6, 2006, which granted the petition for letters of administration with respect to the goods, chattels and credits of decedent Mark Tarka, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent, who was long estranged from her deceased brother, objects to the grant of letters of administration to the Public Administrator. However, the Surrogate’s Court appropriately exercised its broad discretionary authority (see Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone, 85 NY2d 518 [1995]) in finding respondent herself ineligible to serve as a fiduciary of this estate, in view of her history, inter alia, of noncompliance with judicial directives (see SCPA 707 [1] [e]).

We have considered respondent’s arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Tarka, 41 A.D.3d 345, 837 N.Y.S.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 345 (In re the Estate of Tarka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sang Kim Nguyen v. Tran
126 A.D.3d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)