In re the Estate of Tandlich

122 Misc. 600
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 Misc. 600 (In re the Estate of Tandlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Tandlich, 122 Misc. 600 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1924).

Opinion

O’Brien, S.

In this accounting proceeding a question of construction is presented involving the 3d paragraph of the will of the testator, in which he directs that all his property be sold and the proceeds, together with all my money, shall be applied for the study of my nephews and nieces, provided that my nephews and nieces choose to study a profession.”

The testator was survived by fifteen nephews and nieces, four of whom are adults, one is an infant under fourteen years of age and ten are infants over fourteen years of age. The total fund to be applied under this paragraph of the will is $9,187.17. No trust is created, no trustee named, no period named for which the trust is to run, nor any lives referred to by which the duration of a trust is to be measured. The will, it appears, was drawn by an attorney, but hastily and at a time when the deceased was sick in bed.

There is no residuary clause in the will. The testator leaves nine brothers and sisters as his next of kin, so that if this paragraph be construed in such a manner as to result in intestacy as to this fund these brothers and sisters would take to the exclusion of the nephews and nieces. The court is of the opinion, however, that the testator by this 3d paragraph clearly expresses a preference for these nephews and nieces. He does not mention the brothers and sisters. Furthermore, the law favors testacy rather than intestacy where it is possible to adopt such a construction. The provision with regard to the study of a profession is a condition subsequent rather than a condition precedent. This paragraph may be fairly construed as giving legacies to the respective nephews and nieces, with the precatory words attached that they study a profession and the court so construed it. The testator was himself a professional man, being a doctor. It was his wish that his nephews and nieces enter professions. The funds in the hands of the executor are sufficient to give each nephew and niece about $600, which would enable a nephew or niece to study a profession.

I, therefore, hold that under all the circumstances each of testator’s nephews and nieces is entitled to a proportionate share of this fund, to be used by such nephew or niece for the purposes suggested by the testator.

Tax costs and submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Snell
30 Misc. 2d 373 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 Misc. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-tandlich-nysurct-1924.