In re the Estate of Taggart

1 Pow. Surr. 8, 16 N.Y.S. 514, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 368, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2090
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Pow. Surr. 8 (In re the Estate of Taggart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Taggart, 1 Pow. Surr. 8, 16 N.Y.S. 514, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 368, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2090 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Coleman, S.

Petitioner in this casé applies for letters by administration as a creditor of the deceased, to which application the next of kin object, alleging that the deceased did not die intestate, and produce and file with their answer a document purporting to be the last will and testament of the deceased, and ask that these proceedings be dismissed.

The petitioner, however, urges that the proceedings should not be dismissed until it is made to appear that a will has been admitted to probate, and that only an adjournment can be properly applied for by the next of kin, to give them time in which to prove the will, and that failing to so apply, and having stated in open court that they do not intend to offer the will for probate, letters should now be granted as prayed for.

After reflection, I conclude that, it having been shown to this court that the deceased left a document purporting to be a will, administration cannot be granted until the question of the validity of the will has been disposed of, notwithstanding the declared purpose not to offer it for probate.

That no obligation rests upon the next of kin to bring the will to probate in order to avoid administration being taken upon the estate.

• That the will cannot properly be probated in these proceedings.

And that the petitioner may, if he so desires, bring proceedings for the probate of the will, sec. 2614, Code of Civ. Pro., and an adjournment, if it is desired, will be made of these proceedings for that purpose; otherwise these proceedings will be dismissed, with twenty-five dollars costs and disbursements, to be taxed, to be paid to the petitioner from the estate by any executor or administrator hereafter appointed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of de Fontarce
178 Misc. 10 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
Stenzel v. Kreger
299 N.W. 2 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
In Re Estate of Stenzel
299 N.W. 2 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
In Re the Estate of Edwards
97 P. 23 (California Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pow. Surr. 8, 16 N.Y.S. 514, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 368, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-taggart-nysurct-1891.