In re the Estate of Stock
This text of 244 A.D.2d 939 (In re the Estate of Stock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Surrogate’s Court properly denied petitioner’s request to disallow legal fees for respondent law firm. The record amply supports the court’s implicit finding that respondent was not discharged for cause (see, Kyle v Kyle, 94 AD2d 866, lv denied 60 NY2d 557; see also, Teiehner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 978; Marschke v Cross, 82 AD2d 944). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Surrogate’s Court, Wells, S.—Attorney’s Fees.) Present—Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D.2d 939, 668 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-stock-nyappdiv-1997.