In re the Estate of Steinhardt

228 A.D.2d 685, 644 N.Y.2d 970, 644 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 685 (In re the Estate of Steinhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Steinhardt, 228 A.D.2d 685, 644 N.Y.2d 970, 644 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The Surrogate’s Court did not err in admitting evidence of certain events which occurred after the execution of the purported will. This evidence was relevant in determining whether the petitioner had exerted undue influence upon the testator and had a bearing upon the testator’s testamentary capacity at the time of the execution of the purported will (see, Matter of Putnam, 257 NY 140; Matter of McCarthy, 269 App Div 145, affd 296 NY 987; Matter of Norminton, 261 App Div 1105). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Rosen
296 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 685, 644 N.Y.2d 970, 644 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-steinhardt-nyappdiv-1996.