In Re the Estate of Squier

150 A. 430, 106 N.J. Eq. 267, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 588
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 19, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed (with a minor qualification presently to be noted), for the reasons stated in the conclusions of the vice-ordinary.

The qualification is that the concluding language of the opinion seems to read for a dismissal of the appeal instead of an affirmance of the decree of the orphans court; and this language seems to be carried into the decree of the prerogative court. This is a mere slip of the pen, for it is clear that the affirmance was intended and should have been decreed. With this formal modification the decree is affirmed.

*275 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parkee, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Squier, 150 A. 430, 106 N.J. Eq. 267, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 588 (N.J. 1930).

150 A. 430 (In Re the Estate of Squier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Squier v. Martin
24 A.2d 865 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
In Re Tenenbaum
179 A. 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1935)