In re the Estate of Spinale
This text of 140 A.D.2d 611 (In re the Estate of Spinale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[612]*612Because the petitioner failed to sustain her burden of showing that the court had jurisdiction over the nondomiciliary respondents, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Katz, 81 AD2d 145, affd 55 NY2d 904). The record indicates that the respondents did not have the "minimum contacts” with New York necessary to subject them to the court’s jurisdiction (see, International Shoe Co. v Washington, 326 US 310).
We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D.2d 611, 528 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-spinale-nyappdiv-1988.