In re the Estate of Spinale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Spinale

140 A.D.2d 611, 528 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5690

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[612]*612Because the petitioner failed to sustain her burden of showing that the court had jurisdiction over the nondomiciliary respondents, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Katz, 81 AD2d 145, affd 55 NY2d 904). The record indicates that the respondents did not have the "minimum contacts” with New York necessary to subject them to the court’s jurisdiction (see, International Shoe Co. v Washington, 326 US 310).

We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[612]*612Because the petitioner failed to sustain her burden of showing that the court had jurisdiction over the nondomiciliary respondents, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Katz, 81 AD2d 145, affd 55 NY2d 904). The record indicates that the respondents did not have the "minimum contacts” with New York necessary to subject them to the court’s jurisdiction (see, International Shoe Co. v Washington, 326 US 310).

We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Spinale, 140 A.D.2d 611, 528 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

140 A.D.2d 611 (In re the Estate of Spinale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related