In re the Estate of Sparacio

391 N.E.2d 296, 47 N.Y.2d 771, 417 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2040
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.

We agree that the testamentary disposition in this instance was precatory rather than mandatory. The testator, knowledgeable in matters of legal drafting, chose to employ the classic words of precatory import — "wish and desire”. Additionally, the substantive disposition is internally incongruous with a testamentary mandate; the ultimate distribution was not to daughter and friend "in equal shares” but "as in their mutual agreement they decide” — an apportionment impossible of judicial implementation.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Sparacio, 391 N.E.2d 296, 47 N.Y.2d 771, 417 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2040 (N.Y. 1979).

391 N.E.2d 296 (In re the Estate of Sparacio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mercury Bay Boating Club Inc. v. San Diego Yacht Club
150 A.D.2d 82 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Samuelson
110 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)