Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re the Estate of Sparacio

In re the Estate of Sparacio

391 N.E.2d 296, 47 N.Y.2d 771, 417 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2040
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 391 N.E.2d 296 (In re the Estate of Sparacio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Sparacio, 391 N.E.2d 296, 47 N.Y.2d 771, 417 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2040 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.

We agree that the testamentary disposition in this instance was precatory rather than mandatory. The testator, knowledgeable in matters of legal drafting, chose to employ the classic words of precatory import — "wish and desire”. Additionally, the substantive disposition is internally incongruous with a testamentary mandate; the ultimate distribution was not to daughter and friend "in equal shares” but "as in their mutual agreement they decide” — an apportionment impossible of judicial implementation.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mercury Bay Boating Club Inc. v. San Diego Yacht Club
150 A.D.2d 82 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Samuelson
110 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 N.E.2d 296, 47 N.Y.2d 771, 417 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-sparacio-ny-1979.