In re the Estate of Small
279 A.D. 876, 110 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Estate of Small. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D. 837 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1952·Published
Opinion
The charges presented, to which no answer has [877]*877been made, are of such a serious nature as to warrant the Surrogate in making inquiry and determination of his own volition. The domiciliary executor may participate in such proceeding as a matter of comity. (Kirkbride v. Van Note, 275 N. Y. 244, 250.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Small, 279 A.D. 876, 110 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 876 (In re the Estate of Small) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirkbride v. Van Note
9 N.E.2d 852 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)