In re the Estate of Sloat

143 Misc. 170, 256 N.Y.S. 247, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1381
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMarch 21, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 143 Misc. 170 (In re the Estate of Sloat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Sloat, 143 Misc. 170, 256 N.Y.S. 247, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1381 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).

Opinion

Wingate, S.

The testatrix by her will left more than one-half of her estate to charities. The law limits such gifts to one-half of the estate (Dec. Est. Law, § 17). The heirs and next of kin. asserted their legal rights to take the excess over the limitation enjoined by the pertinent statute. The charities affected resisted this assertion of their legal rights and the questions involved were submitted to the court for determination. The rights of the heirs and next of kin to take the excess over one-half the net estate were upheld. The law on the subject was plain and had been frequently and recently considered. All administration expenses, which include allowances to attorneys by way of compensation for services, under the decisions here applicable, must be deducted from the half of the estate passing to the heirs and next of kin.

Attorneys for certain of the charities ask for an allowance out of the estate. Their services were rendered in behalf of the char[172]*172ities’ attempt to keep what the heirs and next of kin were entitled to receive under the law. If the allowance were granted, the effect, would be to compel the heirs and next of kin to pay the lawyers who unsuccessfully opposed them, as well as their own attorneys. Such a result does not seem either just or equitable. Neither the high purposes of the charities, nor the altruistic conduct of counsel can be considered nor would they wish them to be. Before the law all parties are equal.

The application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Accounting of O'Neill
2 Misc. 2d 471 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
In re the Will of Burnside
185 Misc. 808 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)
In re the Estate of Goldberg
164 Misc. 661 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)
In re the Estate of Wolke
155 Misc. 235 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Carney
153 Misc. 505 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re the Estate of Gardner
151 Misc. 342 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 Misc. 170, 256 N.Y.S. 247, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-sloat-nysurct-1932.