In re the Estate of Siegel

Supreme Court of Florida

In re the Estate of Siegel

366 So. 2d 425, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5080

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 21, 1978·No. No. 52833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this case based upon an alleged conflict between the decision in this case reported at 350 So.2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Connor v. Elliott, 79 Fla. 513, 85 So. 164 (1920), or Thomson v. Kyle, 39 Fla. 582, 23 So. 12 (1897). After full consideration of the briefs, the record, and principles discussed at oral argument, we are convinced that there is no conflict between the decision in this case, involving ownership interests in movables, and the decision in any other case.

Accordingly, certiorari should not have been granted, and the writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this case based upon an alleged conflict between the decision in this case reported at 350 So.2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Connor v. Elliott, 79 Fla. 513, 85 So. 164 (1920), or Thomson v. Kyle, 39 Fla. 582, 23 So. 12 (1897). After full consideration of the briefs, the record, and principles discussed at oral argument, we are convinced that there is no conflict between the decision in this case, involving ownership interests in movables, and the decision in any other case.

Accordingly, certiorari should not have been granted, and the writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Siegel, 366 So. 2d 425, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5080 (Fla. 1978).

Pincite

366 So. 2d 425 (In re the Estate of Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related