In re the Estate of Siegel
This text of 366 So. 2d 425 (In re the Estate of Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We issued a writ of certiorari in this case based upon an alleged conflict between the decision in this case reported at 350 So.2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Connor v. Elliott, 79 Fla. 513, 85 So. 164 (1920), or Thomson v. Kyle, 39 Fla. 582, 23 So. 12 (1897). After full consideration of the briefs, the record, and principles discussed at oral argument, we are convinced that there is no conflict between the decision in this case, involving ownership interests in movables, and the decision in any other case.
Accordingly, certiorari should not have been granted, and the writ is discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 So. 2d 425, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-siegel-fla-1978.