In re the Estate of Shymer

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Shymer

136 Misc. 334, 242 N.Y.S. 234, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1293

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 136 Misc. 334 (In re the Estate of Shymer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Shymer, 136 Misc. 334, 242 N.Y.S. 234, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1293 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

O’Brien, S.

By paragraph 1 of her will testatrix gave to her mother her clothing, wardrobe, jewelry, laces and other articles of personalty. She died in the sinking of the Lusitania, leaving her mother surviving her. As the result of proceedings before the Mixed Claims Commission, and by an act of Congress, two payments totalling $8,927 have been received from the United States Government representing the value of jewelry and articles of clothing in the possession of testatrix at the time of her death. A further payment of $2,500 was made to replace a similar amount of cash also lost with the decedent. The question presented on this accounting proceeding is, to what person or persons the above-mentioned sum of $8,927 should be paid. The administrator of the estate of the mother, since deceased, contends that such sum should be paid to him in the place and stead of the articles of jewelry and clothing, for the loss of which it was received by the executor. On the other hand, the husband of decedent contends that there was an ademption of the legacies to the mother, and, therefore, the sum in question should be paid out as part of the residuary estaté, which residue on a previous construction I held must be distributed as in intestacy. This latter contention cannot be sustained. The legacies to the mother were specific within the rule stated in Crawford v. McCarthy (159 N. Y. 514), but there was no destruction, selling or disposition of the articles in question during the lifetime of the testatrix which would have caused an ademption. (Jessup-Redfield, Law & Practice in the Surrogate’s Courts, p. 1332, § 940.) The sum of $8,927, therefore, received from the government, stands in the place and stead of the legacies given by the will to the mother, and should now be paid to the administrator of her estate.

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’Brien, S.

By paragraph 1 of her will testatrix gave to her mother her clothing, wardrobe, jewelry, laces and other articles of personalty. She died in the sinking of the Lusitania, leaving her mother surviving her. As the result of proceedings before the Mixed Claims Commission, and by an act of Congress, two payments totalling $8,927 have been received from the United States Government representing the value of jewelry and articles of clothing in the possession of testatrix at the time of her death. A further payment of $2,500 was made to replace a similar amount of cash also lost with the decedent. The question presented on this accounting proceeding is, to what person or persons the above-mentioned sum of $8,927 should be paid. The administrator of the estate of the mother, since deceased, contends that such sum should be paid to him in the place and stead of the articles of jewelry and clothing, for the loss of which it was received by the executor. On the other hand, the husband of decedent contends that there was an ademption of the legacies to the mother, and, therefore, the sum in question should be paid out as part of the residuary estaté, which residue on a previous construction I held must be distributed as in intestacy. This latter contention cannot be sustained. The legacies to the mother were specific within the rule stated in Crawford v. McCarthy (159 N. Y. 514), but there was no destruction, selling or disposition of the articles in question during the lifetime of the testatrix which would have caused an ademption. (Jessup-Redfield, Law & Practice in the Surrogate’s Courts, p. 1332, § 940.) The sum of $8,927, therefore, received from the government, stands in the place and stead of the legacies given by the will to the mother, and should now be paid to the administrator of her estate.

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 Misc. 334, 242 N.Y.S. 234, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-shymer-nysurct-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack