In re the Estate of Schulze
This text of 120 Misc. 287 (In re the Estate of Schulze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On November 8, 1901, a judgment for the sum of $269.25 was entered by Frederick C. Simons against one Edward Schulze. Nothing further was done by the judgment creditor to collect the judgment except that he filed a claim against the estate of this decedent on July 9, 1921, which was rejected in writing on June 23, 1922. No payment on the judgment or acknowledgment of the indebtedness has been made since the docketing thereof. The claim now comes before the surrogate for determination upon the accounting of the executor. The filing of the claim herein did not stay the running of the statute. Matter of Hoes, 183 App. Div. 38; Brinkman v. Cram, 175 id. 372. Section 44 of the Civil Practice Act extinguished the judgment on November 8, 1921, and the claim is, therefore, disallowed. Matter of Hoes, supra.
Decreed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 Misc. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-schulze-nysurct-1923.