In re the Estate of Schott

754 N.E.2d 769, 96 N.Y.2d 852, 729 N.Y.S.2d 666, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1499
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 754 N.E.2d 769 (In re the Estate of Schott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Schott, 754 N.E.2d 769, 96 N.Y.2d 852, 729 N.Y.S.2d 666, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1499 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as Donald Schott moves for reargument on behalf of George Schott, dismissed upon the ground that Donald is not George’s authorized legal representative; motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied [see, 96 NY2d 704].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
754 N.E.2d 769, 96 N.Y.2d 852, 729 N.Y.S.2d 666, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-schott-ny-2001.