In re the Estate of Rykowski

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Rykowski

106 Misc. 2d 820, 435 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2023

DecidedJanuary 13, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 106 Misc. 2d 820 (In re the Estate of Rykowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Rykowski, 106 Misc. 2d 820, 435 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2023 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radigan, J.

These are two petitions: one by the father of the decedent and the other by the mother as guardian of the two children of the decedent born out of wedlock to revoke the letters issued to the decedent’s wife on the ground of her alleged abandonment of the decedent. The wife now moves to dismiss the petition of the guardian of the children on the ground that they are not persons interested who may petition to request letters since they are not entitled to share in the estate and therefore lack status. While it is true that the nonmarital infants are not distributees so as to share in the probate estate, they are nevertheless interested in any recovery in the wrongful death action (compare EPTL 5-4.5 with EPTL 4-1.2 and Lalli v Lalli, 439 US 259; see, also, Matter of Brown, 101 Misc 2d 805). Under these circumstances it cannot be said that the non-marital infants are uninterested in the question as to whether letters issued to the widow should be revoked because of abandonment. The case of Matter of Wood (203 Misc 809, app dsmd 282 App Div 1093) is distinguishable since it was clear there that the nonmarital children had no interest whatsoever in the decedent’s estate or any cause of action. The motion is accordingly denied. This matter [821]*821will appear on the calendar on Wednesday, January 21, 1981 at 9:30 A.M. to fix a date for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radigan, J.

These are two petitions: one by the father of the decedent and the other by the mother as guardian of the two children of the decedent born out of wedlock to revoke the letters issued to the decedent’s wife on the ground of her alleged abandonment of the decedent. The wife now moves to dismiss the petition of the guardian of the children on the ground that they are not persons interested who may petition to request letters since they are not entitled to share in the estate and therefore lack status. While it is true that the nonmarital infants are not distributees so as to share in the probate estate, they are nevertheless interested in any recovery in the wrongful death action (compare EPTL 5-4.5 with EPTL 4-1.2 and Lalli v Lalli, 439 US 259; see, also, Matter of Brown, 101 Misc 2d 805). Under these circumstances it cannot be said that the non-marital infants are uninterested in the question as to whether letters issued to the widow should be revoked because of abandonment. The case of Matter of Wood (203 Misc 809, app dsmd 282 App Div 1093) is distinguishable since it was clear there that the nonmarital children had no interest whatsoever in the decedent’s estate or any cause of action. The motion is accordingly denied. This matter [821]*821will appear on the calendar on Wednesday, January 21, 1981 at 9:30 A.M. to fix a date for a hearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 Misc. 2d 820, 435 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-rykowski-nysurct-1981.

Opinion

C. Raymond Radigan, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack