In re the Estate of Ross

254 A.D. 805, 4 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7678
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 805 (In re the Estate of Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Ross, 254 A.D. 805, 4 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Appeal from the decision of the Surrogate’s Court, Rensselaer county, and from a decree of such court granted on such decision and entered in the office of the clerk of that court decreeing that two certain policies of insurance issued by the Prudential Life Insurance Company upon the life of decedent herein, and the proceeds thereof, are not assets of the estate and that the estate is not entitled thereto, and directing that the petition in the discovery proceeding relative to said property be dismissed. After the policies were issued to deceased he paid premiums upon them for about seventeen weeks. He then delivered the policies to the agent through whom he had procured them and requested the agent to deliver them to Dr. Smith, the respondent herein, stating that he could not pay the premiums any longer and that Dr. Smith would pay the premiums. The agent testified: “ He came to me and told me that he couldn’t pay them any longer and he handed the policies to me and he wanted me to take them over and give them to Dr. Smith.” The agent delivered the policies to Dr. Smith, who paid premiums on them in the sum of $373.20. The amount of the policies is $607.20. They specified no designated beneficiary. Upon decedent’s death petitioner herein demanded the policies, which demand was refused by respondent upon the ground that the policies were given to him by deceased. Decree and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent against the appellant. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Leon Tawil v. Sutton
2024 NY Slip Op 30575(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 805, 4 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-ross-nyappdiv-1938.