In re the Estate of Rosenzweig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Rosenzweig

88 A.D.2d 619, 450 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 619 (In re the Estate of Rosenzweig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Rosenzweig, 88 A.D.2d 619, 450 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a will construction proceeding, Stella Rosenzweig appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated July 23,1981, as determined that paragraph Four-D of the testator’s will included as secondary income beneficiaries of the trust solely those 13 grandnieces and grandnephews living at the time of the testator’s death and that the trust provisions of paragraph “Fourth” do not violate the rule against perpetuities. Decree affirmed, insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Surrogate Bloom, with costs to petitioners payable out of the estate. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a will construction proceeding, Stella Rosenzweig appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated July 23,1981, as determined that paragraph Four-D of the testator’s will included as secondary income beneficiaries of the trust solely those 13 grandnieces and grandnephews living at the time of the testator’s death and that the trust provisions of paragraph “Fourth” do not violate the rule against perpetuities. Decree affirmed, insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Surrogate Bloom, with costs to petitioners payable out of the estate. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 619, 450 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-rosenzweig-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack