In re the Estate of Rosenzweig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Rosenzweig

88 A.D.2d 619, 450 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16816

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— In a will construction proceeding, Stella Rosenzweig appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated July 23,1981, as determined that paragraph Four-D of the testator’s will included as secondary income beneficiaries of the trust solely those 13 grandnieces and grandnephews living at the time of the testator’s death and that the trust provisions of paragraph “Fourth” do not violate the rule against perpetuities. Decree affirmed, insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Surrogate Bloom, with costs to petitioners payable out of the estate. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a will construction proceeding, Stella Rosenzweig appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated July 23,1981, as determined that paragraph Four-D of the testator’s will included as secondary income beneficiaries of the trust solely those 13 grandnieces and grandnephews living at the time of the testator’s death and that the trust provisions of paragraph “Fourth” do not violate the rule against perpetuities. Decree affirmed, insofar as appealed from, on the opinion of Surrogate Bloom, with costs to petitioners payable out of the estate. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Rosenzweig, 88 A.D.2d 619, 450 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

88 A.D.2d 619 (In re the Estate of Rosenzweig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related