In re the Estate of Rosenhain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Rosenhain

161 A.D.2d 912

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Estate of Rosenhain. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 A.D.2d 835 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1990·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Delaware County (Estes, S.), entered September 18, 1989, which denied petitioner’s motion to disqualify the Surrogate and partially granted intervenor’s cross motion to limit the issues to be considered at a hearing on petitioner’s application to vacate a decree of judicial settlement.

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Surrogate Robert L. Estes. Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Delaware County (Estes, S.), entered September 18, 1989, which denied petitioner’s motion to disqualify the Surrogate and partially granted intervenor’s cross motion to limit the issues to be considered at a hearing on petitioner’s application to vacate a decree of judicial settlement.

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Surrogate Robert L. Estes. Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Rosenhain, 161 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

161 A.D.2d 912 (In re the Estate of Rosenhain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.