In Re the Estate of Rosenhain

666 N.E.2d 1056, 87 N.Y.2d 1053, 644 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1132
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as it is taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed that portion of the Surrogate’s Court order imposing sanctions, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Levine taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Rosenhain, 666 N.E.2d 1056, 87 N.Y.2d 1053, 644 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1132 (N.Y. 1996).

666 N.E.2d 1056 (In Re the Estate of Rosenhain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yan Ping Xu v. New York City Department of Health
77 A.D.3d 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)