In re the Estate of Rosenblath
240 A.D. 846
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Ulman, 238 App. Div. 864; Edson v. Parsons, 155 N. Y. 555; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 id. 28; Hermann v. Ludwig, 186 App. Div. 287.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ. [146 Misc. 424.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Rosenblath, 240 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 846 (In re the Estate of Rosenblath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edson v. . Parsons
50 N.E. 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Hermann v. Ludwig
186 A.D. 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
In re the Specific Performance of the Agreement between Ulman & Ulman
238 A.D. 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
In re the Estate of Rosenblath
146 Misc. 424 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)