In re the Estate of Rose
245 N.E.2d 808, 23 N.Y.2d 870, 298 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1617
Opinion
Order affirmed on the opinion of the Surrogate, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.
Concur s Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Keating, Brbitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Rose, 245 N.E.2d 808, 23 N.Y.2d 870, 298 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1617 (N.Y. 1969).
245 N.E.2d 808 (In re the Estate of Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Estate of Warren
143 A.D.3d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re the State of Carmer
111 A.D.2d 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)