In re the Estate of Rose
245 N.E.2d 808, 23 N.Y.2d 870, 298 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1617
This text of 245 N.E.2d 808 (In re the Estate of Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Estate of Rose, 245 N.E.2d 808, 23 N.Y.2d 870, 298 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1617 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinion
Order affirmed on the opinion of the Surrogate, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.
Concur s Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Keating, Brbitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re the Estate of Warren
143 A.D.3d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re the State of Carmer
111 A.D.2d 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
245 N.E.2d 808, 23 N.Y.2d 870, 298 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-rose-ny-1969.