In re the Estate of Roddick

Arizona Supreme Court

In re the Estate of Roddick

1 Ariz. 411

DecidedJanuary 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ariz. 411 (In re the Estate of Roddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Roddick, 1 Ariz. 411 (Ark. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

By Court,

French, C. J\:

The appeal in this case is from an order of the probate court of the county of Pima, wherein the claim of Guadalupe Roddick for family allowance was denied.

The appeal should have been to the district court of the first district. No appeal lies from a probate court to the supreme court. All appeals from the probate court must be to the district court. The action of the district court on such appeal may be reviewed here. Appeal is the creation of the statute, and the whole matter of appeals is expressly provided for in the statutes of the territory.

Appeal dismissed.

Porter and Silent, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Court,

French, C. J\:

The appeal in this case is from an order of the probate court of the county of Pima, wherein the claim of Guadalupe Roddick for family allowance was denied.

The appeal should have been to the district court of the first district. No appeal lies from a probate court to the supreme court. All appeals from the probate court must be to the district court. The action of the district court on such appeal may be reviewed here. Appeal is the creation of the statute, and the whole matter of appeals is expressly provided for in the statutes of the territory.

Appeal dismissed.

Porter and Silent, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ariz. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-roddick-ariz-1883.