In re the Estate of Rizzo

2 A.D.2d 993, 158 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3391
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to establish the right to inheritance of real property, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, which, inter alia, granted respondent’s motion for judgment, granted letters of administration to respondent, and dismissed the [994]*994petition to establish appellant’s right of inheritance as the intestate’s widow. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable by appellant personally. There is no proof in the record that appellant and the intestate were ever validly married. We have not considered the facts or statements contained in appellant’s brief purporting to show that she and the intestate entered into a common-law marriage outside the State of New York, because such facts or statements are not in the record before us. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Rizzo, 2 A.D.2d 993, 158 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

2 A.D.2d 993 (In re the Estate of Rizzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
352 F. Supp. 270 (S.D. New York, 1972)