In re the Estate of Rein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Rein

198 A.D.2d 283, 604 N.Y.S.2d 816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 283 (In re the Estate of Rein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Rein, 198 A.D.2d 283, 604 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to determine the validity [284]*284and enforceability of claims filed by Gordon Marshall against the estate of Harold E. Rein, Gordon Marshall appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated November 19, 1990, as granted Ruth D. Rein’s motion for summary judgment dismissing as invalid the claim of Gordon Marshall that Harold E. Rein had forfeited his interest in Xanadu Properties Associates.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally, for reasons stated by Brewster, S., at the Surrogate’s Court. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to determine the validity [284]*284and enforceability of claims filed by Gordon Marshall against the estate of Harold E. Rein, Gordon Marshall appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated November 19, 1990, as granted Ruth D. Rein’s motion for summary judgment dismissing as invalid the claim of Gordon Marshall that Harold E. Rein had forfeited his interest in Xanadu Properties Associates.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally, for reasons stated by Brewster, S., at the Surrogate’s Court. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 283, 604 N.Y.S.2d 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-rein-nyappdiv-1993.