In re the Estate of Reid

206 N.C. 102
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 1934·Published

Opinion

BeogdeN, J.

When Moses Reid died his distributees were his father, Adolphus Reid, and his mother, Ida Reid. Both were living. The statute cast upon each one-half of the personal property of deceased. Thereupon the right of property to such one-half immediately vested. O. S., 137, subsection 6.

Neither received as beneficiary in the war risk insurance policy any installment from the government during his or her life. Therefore, the whole fund in contemplation of law is now assets of the estate of the dead soldier, to be distributed immediately to the estates of his father and mother. The fact that one beneficiary lived longer than the other and hence entitled to receive more money in installments from the government, has nothing to do with the right of property as distributee. The intestate law of this State pegged that right at the death of the soldier. In re Estate of Pruden, 199 N. C., 256, 154 S. E., 7; Grady v. Holl, 199 N. C., 666, 155 S. E., 565; Mixon v. Mixon, 203 N. C., 566, 166 S. E., 516; In re Saunders, 205 N. C., 241; Singleton v. Cheek, 284 U. S., 493, 76 L. Ed., 419. See, also, Stacy v. Culbertson et al., 160 S. E., 50.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Reid, 206 N.C. 102 (N.C. 1934).

206 N.C. 102 (In re the Estate of Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singleton v. Cheek
284 U.S. 493 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Mixon v. . Mixon
166 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
In Re Saunders
171 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Grady v. . Holl
155 S.E. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
In Re Estate of Pruden
154 S.E. 7 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Grady v. Holl
199 N.C. 666 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Stacy v. Culbertson
160 S.E. 50 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1931)