In re the Estate of Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Reed

17 A.D.2d 952, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 952 (In re the Estate of Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Reed, 17 A.D.2d 952, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to probate a will, the executor and certain of the legatees thereunder appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1962, which, upon petitioners’ application: (a) vacated a prior decree of said court, dated July 8, 1960, admitting the will to probate; (b) permitted the petitioners to become parties to the proceeding and to file objections to such probate; and (e) granted related relief. The application was made on the ground that the petitioners, who claimed to be the sole distributees of the decedent, had not been cited in the probate proceeding. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to petitioners, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to probate a will, the executor and certain of the legatees thereunder appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1962, which, upon petitioners’ application: (a) vacated a prior decree of said court, dated July 8, 1960, admitting the will to probate; (b) permitted the petitioners to become parties to the proceeding and to file objections to such probate; and (e) granted related relief. The application was made on the ground that the petitioners, who claimed to be the sole distributees of the decedent, had not been cited in the probate proceeding. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to petitioners, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 952, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-reed-nyappdiv-1962.