In re the Estate of Preisendorfer

118 Misc. 524
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided April 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Foley, S.

In this discovery proceeding an answer has been filed, in which the respondent claims title to the property sought to be discovered. It also appears that an action has been commenced by the respondent in the Supreme Court of this county, in which issue has been joined. That action is against the savings bank and the administrator for the recovery of a bank deposit standing in the name of the decedent, claimed by the respondent as a gift causa mortis. The Supreme Court having first acquired jurisdiction, comity requires that this proceeding be dismissed. [525]*525The only result of an examination held here would be to furnish and discover evidence which the petitioner could use in the pending action. Under the circumstances here present this course cannot be permitted. Matter of Denham, N. Y. L. J. June 23, 1917; affd., 180 App. Div. 935. Submit order on notice accordingly.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Preisendorfer, 118 Misc. 524 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1922).

118 Misc. 524 (In re the Estate of Preisendorfer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Harriton
173 Misc. 500 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
In re the Estate of Andrews
172 Misc. 373 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
In re the Estate of Erlanger
148 Misc. 339 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re Lichtblau
131 Misc. 826 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1928)