In re the Estate of Precanico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Precanico

21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 981 (In re the Estate of Precanico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Precanico, 21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellants, pursuant to stipulation of the parties dated October 2, 1963, to dispense with printing on appeal from decree granting probate. Motion denied. Particularly in view of the agreement between the parties, appellants objective of not printing all those portions of the record which are not material to the issues on the appeal can be achieved by simply complying with the applicable provisions of the new CPLR and with the applicable recent rules of this court (see Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 294; CPLR 5525-5531; Rules, App. Div., 2d Dept., rules I, IV). Beldoek, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellants, pursuant to stipulation of the parties dated October 2, 1963, to dispense with printing on appeal from decree granting probate. Motion denied. Particularly in view of the agreement between the parties, appellants objective of not printing all those portions of the record which are not material to the issues on the appeal can be achieved by simply complying with the applicable provisions of the new CPLR and with the applicable recent rules of this court (see Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 294; CPLR 5525-5531; Rules, App. Div., 2d Dept., rules I, IV). Beldoek, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-precanico-nyappdiv-1963.