In re the Estate of Polley

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Polley

141 Misc. 662, 253 N.Y.S. 832, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1544

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedOctober 26, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 Misc. 662 (In re the Estate of Polley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Polley, 141 Misc. 662, 253 N.Y.S. 832, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1544 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pelletreau, S.

William. L. Polley died May 14, 1908, leaving a will dated May 28, 1896. Same was duly probated in this court. The 2d paragraph of his will reads as follows:

“ Second. I give, devise and bequeath to my wife, Mary A. Polley all the remainder of my property real and personal during her natural life, and at her decease, I devise and bequeath all said property to my daughters, Emma H. Fields and Fannie A. Ashcraft and my wife’s son, Walter C. Robinson, share and share alike and if either of them shall have died before the decease of my said wife leaving a child or children such child or children shall take the share that such deceased parent would have received if living.”

The widow, Mary A. Polley, died May 3, 1931. The daughter, Emma H. Fields, died February 11, 1930, and before the death of her mother aforesaid. The said daughter, Emma H. Fields, left no children her surviving but was survived by two grandchildren, Martha Fields, born July 22, 1915, and Harold Fields, born September 8, 1919. They are children of William H. Fields, a son of Emma H. Fields aforesaid; he died February 3, 1923.

I am asked to construe the aforesaid paragraph of the will of William L. Polley in the light of the above facts and determine whether the said minors, Martha Fields and Harold Fields, grandchildren of Emma H, Fields aforesaid, have any interest in said estate.

[663]*663The term “ children ” in a will must be taken in its primary sense in the absence of any indication of intention to include grandchildren or great-grandchildren. The intention of the testator was clearly evinced. In this case an enlarged use of the word “ children ” is not justified by the language of the will. In view of the above, I must hold that the grandchildren of Emma H. Fields cannot inherit their grandmother’s share in the above estate. (See 40 Cyc. 1450; Remsen Preparation of Wills & Trusts [2d ed.], 96; Matter of Sparks, 27 Misc. 350; Matter of Davenport, 85 id. 671; Matter of Smith, 121 id. 662.)

Submit decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pelletreau, S.

William. L. Polley died May 14, 1908, leaving a will dated May 28, 1896. Same was duly probated in this court. The 2d paragraph of his will reads as follows:

“ Second. I give, devise and bequeath to my wife, Mary A. Polley all the remainder of my property real and personal during her natural life, and at her decease, I devise and bequeath all said property to my daughters, Emma H. Fields and Fannie A. Ashcraft and my wife’s son, Walter C. Robinson, share and share alike and if either of them shall have died before the decease of my said wife leaving a child or children such child or children shall take the share that such deceased parent would have received if living.”

The widow, Mary A. Polley, died May 3, 1931. The daughter, Emma H. Fields, died February 11, 1930, and before the death of her mother aforesaid. The said daughter, Emma H. Fields, left no children her surviving but was survived by two grandchildren, Martha Fields, born July 22, 1915, and Harold Fields, born September 8, 1919. They are children of William H. Fields, a son of Emma H. Fields aforesaid; he died February 3, 1923.

I am asked to construe the aforesaid paragraph of the will of William L. Polley in the light of the above facts and determine whether the said minors, Martha Fields and Harold Fields, grandchildren of Emma H, Fields aforesaid, have any interest in said estate.

[663]*663The term “ children ” in a will must be taken in its primary sense in the absence of any indication of intention to include grandchildren or great-grandchildren. The intention of the testator was clearly evinced. In this case an enlarged use of the word “ children ” is not justified by the language of the will. In view of the above, I must hold that the grandchildren of Emma H. Fields cannot inherit their grandmother’s share in the above estate. (See 40 Cyc. 1450; Remsen Preparation of Wills & Trusts [2d ed.], 96; Matter of Sparks, 27 Misc. 350; Matter of Davenport, 85 id. 671; Matter of Smith, 121 id. 662.)

Submit decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 Misc. 662, 253 N.Y.S. 832, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-polley-nysurct-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack