In re the Estate of Perlman
This text of 381 So. 2d 248 (In re the Estate of Perlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At issue is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to strike a claim filed beyond the statutory time provided for the filing of claims against an estate. There is no dispute that the claim was untimely filed. Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1977). Generally, absent the existence of certain recognized exceptions, a claim is barred unless timely filed. North v. Culmer, 193 So.2d 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). No exception is demonstrated in the record here. Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 So. 2d 248, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-perlman-fladistctapp-1979.