In re the Estate of Pelsoni

182 A.D.2d 1129, 586 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023

This text of 182 A.D.2d 1129 (In re the Estate of Pelsoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Pelsoni, 182 A.D.2d 1129, 586 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this action to compel specific performance of a trust agreement, we agree with the Surrogate’s finding that claimant did not meet his burden of proving his performance of the agreement. Further, by failing to refer to that issue in his appellant’s brief, claimant has waived its review (see, Hodge v LoRusso 181 AD2d 1009). (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Surrogate’s Court, DiFlorio, S. — Claims Against Estate.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodge v. LoRusso
181 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 1129, 586 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-pelsoni-nyappdiv-1992.