In re the Estate of Pelsoni
182 A.D.2d 1129, 586 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this action to compel specific performance of a trust agreement, we agree with the Surrogate’s finding that claimant did not meet his burden of proving his performance of the agreement. Further, by failing to refer to that issue in his appellant’s brief, claimant has waived its review (see, Hodge v LoRusso 181 AD2d 1009). (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Surrogate’s Court, DiFlorio, S. — Claims Against Estate.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Pelsoni, 182 A.D.2d 1129, 586 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
182 A.D.2d 1129 (In re the Estate of Pelsoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodge v. LoRusso
181 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)