In re the Estate of Paris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Paris

21 A.D.2d 794, 252 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3603

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 794 (In re the Estate of Paris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Paris, 21 A.D.2d 794, 252 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of Philip H. Paris, deceased, in which limited. letters were issued on March 14, 1963 to Benjamin Paris as administrator, empowering him to commence an action on behalf of the estate, the said administrator appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered September 17, 1963, which granted the petition of respondent, Joseph A. Bochenek: (a) to enlarge such limited letters by also empowering the administrator to defend an action against the decedent, then pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County; and (b) to resettle accordingly, nunc pro tuno as of. March 14, 1963, the prior decree of the Surrogate’s Court granting limited letters. Such petitioner Bochenek is an attorney associated with counsel for the plaintiffs in said action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. [For companion appeal, see Sugar v. Miller, 21 A D 2d 796.] Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of Philip H. Paris, deceased, in which limited. letters were issued on March 14, 1963 to Benjamin Paris as administrator, empowering him to commence an action on behalf of the estate, the said administrator appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered September 17, 1963, which granted the petition of respondent, Joseph A. Bochenek: (a) to enlarge such limited letters by also empowering the administrator to defend an action against the decedent, then pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County; and (b) to resettle accordingly, nunc pro tuno as of. March 14, 1963, the prior decree of the Surrogate’s Court granting limited letters. Such petitioner Bochenek is an attorney associated with counsel for the plaintiffs in said action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. [For companion appeal, see Sugar v. Miller, 21 A D 2d 796.] Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 794, 252 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-paris-nyappdiv-1964.