In re the Estate of Pardee

239 A.D. 876
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a proceeding brought under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act to fix the amount of the compensation of an attorney for services rendered to an estate or to its executor or administrator, there is no absolute right to a jury trial under sections 67 and 68 of the Surrogate’s Act because the attorney has no constitutional right to the trial of the issue by a jury, as no right of action for such compensation existed in favor of the attorney against the executor or administrator as such. The present proceeding is not akin to an action to recover the value of petitioner’s services against the executors .personally; it is equitable in its nature, and-the right to a trial by jury prior to 1846 did not exist in equitable actions. All concur. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. [145 Misc. 634.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Pardee, 239 A.D. 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

239 A.D. 876 (In re the Estate of Pardee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Pepi
47 Misc. 2d 137 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
In re the Estate of Garfield
200 N.E.2d 196 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
In re the Estate of Richards
5 A.D.2d 124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
In re the Estate of Davis
10 Misc. 2d 347 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Estate of Ludlam
5 Misc. 2d 1068 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Estate of Leary
175 Misc. 254 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
In re the Estate of Popek
157 Misc. 421 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)