In re the Estate of Oppenheimer

166 Misc. 522, 2 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1347
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 166 Misc. 522 (In re the Estate of Oppenheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Oppenheimer, 166 Misc. 522, 2 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1347 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1938).

Opinion

Foley, S.

The executors in Schedule I of the account have properly allocated the Federal estate tax and any additional amount that may be payable thereon by way of a deficiency to the trustee under the insurance trust created by the decedent in his lifetime. Since the estate of the decedent, aside from the insurance paid to the trustee as beneficiary, is insolvent, the creditors of the estate cannot be charged with any portion of the estate taxes.

Section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law provides for the proration of taxes by the surrogate among the persons interested in the estate “ in the proportion, as near as may be, that the value of the property, interest or benefit of each such person bears to the total value of the property, interests and benefits received by all such persons interested in the estate. ’ ’ The property, interests or benefits referred to are those received from the decedent by way of purchase or descent, and not those received by way of administration expenses or claims against the decedent. These latter items are deductible in arriving at the taxable net estate. (Tax Law, § 249-s.) Section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law specifically provides that in making the proration, allowance shall be made for any deductions allowed by such act for the purpose of arriving at the value of the net estate.” It is only after debts and administration expenses have been paid that a proration of taxes is to be made among those sharing in a distribution of the assets. The term “ person interested in the estate,” as defined in section 249-m of the Tax Law, includes only those who take an interest in the estate “ under a will, or intestacy, or by reason of any of the transfers, trusts, estates, interests, rights, powers, and relinquishment of powers ” enumerated in section 249-r [524]*524of the Tax Law. The definition does not embrace creditors of the estate who participate in the assets by reason of claims against the decedent and not from or through him by way of gift or descent.

The decree to be entered may contain a provision directing the trustee óf the insurance trust to reimburse the executors for the estate taxes paid by them. (Dec. Est. Law, § 124, subd. 2.)

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Vernon
107 Misc. 2d 1021 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1981)
In re the Estate of Arnold
36 Misc. 2d 695 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
In re the Estate of Porter
12 Misc. 2d 180 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Estate of Galewitz
3 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
In re the Estate of Galewitz
3 Misc. 2d 197 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1955)
In re the Accounting of Manufacturers Trust Co.
1 Misc. 2d 887 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1955)
In Re the Will of Brokaw
59 N.E.2d 243 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
In re the Will of Brokaw
180 Misc. 490 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 Misc. 522, 2 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-oppenheimer-nysurct-1938.