In re the Estate of Onody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Onody

17 A.D.2d 977, 235 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 977 (In re the Estate of Onody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Onody, 17 A.D.2d 977, 235 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for the construction of a will, the petitioner-executor appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated March 27, 1962: (1) as adjudged that said will revoked a “Totten Trust” savings bank account maintained by the testator for the benefit of his widow; (2) as contained further directions in accordance with said adjudication; and (3) as allowed to the respondent special guardian the sum of $600 as compensation for his services. Decree affirmed, with costs to the special guardian, payable out of the estate. The $600 allowance is deemed by us to include the services rendered by the special guardian incident to this appeal. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [33 Misc 2d 497.] 9 Mary v. Home Title Guaranty

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for the construction of a will, the petitioner-executor appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated March 27, 1962: (1) as adjudged that said will revoked a “Totten Trust” savings bank account maintained by the testator for the benefit of his widow; (2) as contained further directions in accordance with said adjudication; and (3) as allowed to the respondent special guardian the sum of $600 as compensation for his services. Decree affirmed, with costs to the special guardian, payable out of the estate. The $600 allowance is deemed by us to include the services rendered by the special guardian incident to this appeal. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [33 Misc 2d 497.] 9 Mary v. Home Title Guaranty

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 977, 235 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-onody-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack