In re the Estate of Olshen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Olshen

46 A.D.2d 911, 363 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 911 (In re the Estate of Olshen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Olshen, 46 A.D.2d 911, 363 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to settle an account of the executors, the Attorney-General appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated September 10, 1973, as, after a hearing on certain claims, (1) directs the executors to pay $5,000 to claimant Fannie Gelbman for services rendered to the decedent and (2) states that the balance remaining for payment to certain eleemosynary institutions totals $11,591.51. By written stipulation, dated December 2, 1974, the parties, through their attorneys, have agreed to specific modifications of the decree. In accordance with the stipulation, the decree [912]*912is modified (1) by reducing the direction for payment to Fannie Gelbman to $3,500; (2) by directing the executors to pay (a) the Attorney-General the actual amount expended by him for the printing of his record and brief on this appeal and (b) coexeeutor Charles Gliekman $30, Ms actual expense for the printing of his brief on this appeal; and (3) by changing the above-mentioned balance figure of $11,591.51 accordingly. As so modified, decree affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and without further disbursements. ■ Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to settle an account of the executors, the Attorney-General appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated September 10, 1973, as, after a hearing on certain claims, (1) directs the executors to pay $5,000 to claimant Fannie Gelbman for services rendered to the decedent and (2) states that the balance remaining for payment to certain eleemosynary institutions totals $11,591.51. By written stipulation, dated December 2, 1974, the parties, through their attorneys, have agreed to specific modifications of the decree. In accordance with the stipulation, the decree [912]*912is modified (1) by reducing the direction for payment to Fannie Gelbman to $3,500; (2) by directing the executors to pay (a) the Attorney-General the actual amount expended by him for the printing of his record and brief on this appeal and (b) coexeeutor Charles Gliekman $30, Ms actual expense for the printing of his brief on this appeal; and (3) by changing the above-mentioned balance figure of $11,591.51 accordingly. As so modified, decree affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and without further disbursements. ■ Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 911, 363 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-olshen-nyappdiv-1974.