In re the Estate of Newins

187 N.E.2d 360, 12 N.Y.2d 824
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 1962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: By reason of the strong legislative policy reflected in subdivision 7 of section 1135 of the Civil Practice Act, we read the broad language of section 40 of the Surrogate’s Court Act to vest in the Surrogate the power to decide and declare that a child of a void or voidable marriage is the legitimate child of the decedent whose will or estate is before him. (Cf., e.g., People ex rel. Bennett v. Laman, 277 N. Y. 368, 382-384.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis, Bubke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Newins, 187 N.E.2d 360, 12 N.Y.2d 824 (N.Y. 1962).

187 N.E.2d 360 (In re the Estate of Newins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Shubert
110 Misc. 2d 635 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1981)
In re the Estate of Kennedy
89 Misc. 2d 551 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1977)