In re the Estate of Neil

16 Mills Surr. 515, 95 Misc. 463, 159 N.Y.S. 110
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMay 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Mills Surr. 515 (In re the Estate of Neil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Neil, 16 Mills Surr. 515, 95 Misc. 463, 159 N.Y.S. 110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1916).

Opinion

Fowler, S.—

This- is a probate proceeding for the probate of the will of testator as a will of real property and comes before me on objection to probate. This same will was admitted to- probate by a decree of this court on July 3, 1915, as a will of personal property. (90 Misc. Rep. 537.) The present proceeding is brought, so the petition alleges, for the reason that at the time the will w*as originally offered for probate the proponent was ignorant of the existence of any real- property. . The will in its terms bequeaths and devises personal and real property. Upon the hearing counsel for the contestant waived the proof of factum and agreed that the testimony be closed. The main objection urged by contestant is that the former probate [516]*516proceeding is a bar to this proceeding. With this I do not agree. The objections are dismissed. Present decree admitting the paper propounded as a will of real property.

Probate decreed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fransioli v. Podesta
134 S.W.2d 162 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Mills Surr. 515, 95 Misc. 463, 159 N.Y.S. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-neil-nysurct-1916.