In re the Estate of Morrison

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Estate of Morrison

746 N.E.2d 183, 96 N.Y.2d 747, 723 N.Y.S.2d 128, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 195

DecidedFebruary 13, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 746 N.E.2d 183 (In re the Estate of Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Morrison, 746 N.E.2d 183, 96 N.Y.2d 747, 723 N.Y.S.2d 128, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 195 (N.Y. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of the Surrogate’s Court order which, upon reargument, adhered to its prior order directing Leonard M. Morrison to provide accountings, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order affirming the Surrogate’s Court order made upon reargument, denied. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal directly from the Surrogate’s Court order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie (see, CPLR 5602). Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of the Surrogate’s Court order which, upon reargument, adhered to its prior order directing Leonard M. Morrison to provide accountings, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order affirming the Surrogate’s Court order made upon reargument, denied. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal directly from the Surrogate’s Court order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie (see, CPLR 5602). Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

746 N.E.2d 183, 96 N.Y.2d 747, 723 N.Y.S.2d 128, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-morrison-ny-2001.